4 Comments
User's avatar
Brett V.'s avatar

Are you serious? You want to “protect” a wife-beating, illegal immigrant , MS13 gang member from being deported back to his home country, where he holds citizenship, because he is afraid of rival gang violence? The same guy that was picked up on suspicion of human trafficking. And you think that this administration that is trying to protect American citizens from people like this puts the citizens in danger? I cannot understand you people. This guy is totally illegal. He has NO right to be in this country, full stop. And you want to ensure he gets caught raping or killing someone or enslaving someone’s daughter before he gets deported? What is wrong with you? You have taken some seemingly noble ideal to such an extreme that it has turned on itself. It is completely nonsensical.

Expand full comment
Tracey Taylor's avatar

Due process is not just a seemingly noble ideal; it protects the innocent. And if this man is guilty of all these crimes, and no one here is saying he isn’t, due process will insure his removal.

Expand full comment
Brett V.'s avatar

This violent illegal alien already had due process. He had more “due process” than he is due. He is a wife beating (read the police report), MS 13 gang member. All of that is documented including his gang affiliation. It is part of his adjudicated immigration decision. That immigration judge said he has no right to be here. The “mistake” deporting him was clerical. He is scheduled to be deported anyway. They will pay a lot of money getting him back and he won’t even be released. He will be reprocessed and deported. He is not an American citizen and this has NO implications for American citizens except that they are a little safer with this criminal locked up and locked out. I think you guys should find another cause. This one is showing too much skin.

Expand full comment
Brett V.'s avatar

I said seemingly because it is misapplied in this case, not because it has no value.

Expand full comment